Is the Incarnation Incoherent?Ask Hank
“The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.”—John 1:14 Like the Trinity, the Incarnation is often considered to be logically incoherent. While the Incarnation transcends our human understanding it does not transgress the laws of logic. First, since God created humanity in His own image (Gen. 1:27), the essential properties of human nature (rationality, will, moral character, etc.) are not inconsistent with His divine nature. Though the notion of God becoming a clam would be absurd, the reality that God became a man is not. Furthermore, it is crucial to point out that though the God‐Man is fully human He is not merely human.Though He took on all the essential properties of human nature, He did not take on that which is nonessential (e.g., a sin nature). Indeed, as Adam was created without a sin nature, so the second Adam was untainted by original sin. As with His moral perfection, Jesus’ other divine attributes (omniscience, omnipotence, omnipresence, etc.) were not undermined in the Incarnation. Finally, while Jesus Christ voluntarily refrained from exercising certain attributes of deity, He did not divest Himself of a single divine attribute (John 1:14; Phil. 2:1‐11; Col. 1:15–20; Heb. 2:14–18). With respect to His omniscience, for example, His human nature may have served as a filter limiting his knowledge as a man (e.g., Mark 13:32). Nonetheless, Jesus’ divine omniscience was ever accessible at the will of the Father. In sum, there is no incoherence in the biblical teaching that Jesus became and will forever remain one person with two distinct natures—neither commingling His natures nor becoming two persons .2 — Hank Hanegraaff NOTES
|
Facebook
Twitter
Tumblr
Youtube
Vimeo
Blogger
CRI Canada
Charlotte, NC 28271